Tag: artificial intelligence

  • Is AI perfect?

    I was helping my daughter with her essay for her class work in grade 12 IBDP. I watched her read and refer to different sources and write each sentence in her own words. 1400 words for a child who isn’t into writing or much reading is a tough job in today’s  world. She submitted it to her teacher the next day and pat comes the reply…’AI generated’. Needless to say my daughter was disappointed because she had written the entire essay on her own. When I talked to the teacher, he said that they use a special  AI detector for IB and I should not  check in any other tools. I went online and I  read this article.

    Can AI detectors identify AI-generated content?
    AI content detectors are not always shown to be 100% accurate and can often lead to false positives. Since AI detection tools rely on writing patterns and language structures that are characteristic of AI-generated content, they can incorrectly flag human-written articles that mimic a similar style.

    As our analysis shows, AI content detectors are not always shown to be 100% accurate.
    These tools are not perfect and often mistakenly classify human-written content as AI-generated due to certain factors:

    Writing style: You may inadvertently use language patterns or phrases similar to those generated by AI models.
    Repetitive phrases or ideas: You might be using similar phrases multiple times in your writing. This is one of the most common reasons for false AI content detection.
    Unusual grammar or syntax: If your writing uses unconventional grammar or sentence structures, AI detection tools might misinterpret this as a sign of AI-generated content.
    Limited training data: AI detection tools rely on training data to learn how to distinguish between human and AI-generated content. If the training data of the AI detector is limited or biased, it can affect the tool’s accuracy and lead to false readings.
    Evolving AI algorithms: As AI writing models become more advanced and capable of mimicking human-like language patterns, it’s becoming more difficult for detection tools to differentiate between human and AI-generated content accurately.
    AI detection tools are constantly having to improve and adapt to new developments in AI-generated content. However, false detections of human-written content as AI-generated may still occur due to the factors above.

    At this moment, I don’t recommend relying solely on AI content detectors to distinguish between human and AI-generated text.

    However, AI tools like ChatGPT have pledged to watermark their generated text in a bid to authenticate AI-generated content versus human writers.

    This could potentially make AI detectors more accurate in the future.”

    My point is how can teachers do this to a child? How can they blindly trust a new software and not understand a child’s hardwork when the software is not 100 percent accurate and still evolving?